2010.05 | From Self Service to Make it Yourself

February 7, 2010 Tim Dickey Leave a comment

After reading the fascinating and highly recommended Why Your World Is About to Get a Whole Lot Smaller by Jeff Rubins, it got me thinking about really big picture environmental and social changes and their impact on retail.   One small outcome of the changes to come according to this very broad and intelligent book is that the increasing cost of oil will drive the cost of transportation so high that a whole lot more manufacturing will take place in North America.  As oil costs rise, the  lower wages for manufacturing in far flung places will be offset by increased transportation costs.  It’s already happened to a certain degree as part of the recent recession.  As chief economist at CIBC for 20 years, Jeff’s ideas have credence.

Another big picture idea that blew me away was in the latest issue of Wired that includes an article about a new generation of affordable technology allowing for incredibly cost effective product development and for crowdsourced projects.  One example is the makerbot open source 3d printer, a kit that anyone can buy for $700 and assemble to “print” 3 dimensional items using ABS plastic from plans that can be made with free tools like Google Sketchup.

The impact of these two items to retail?

  • There will be an increased demand for labour for manufacturing jobs in coming years if Jeff Rubin is correct.  The result are fewer people to keep the service economy going.  The people that work in the hospitality industry, the grocery stores, the boutiques, movie theatres, and more.  This means more demand for technology solutions to deal with labour scarcity and reduce flexibility.  This was a problem during the oil boom in Western Canada in the 2007-2008 timeframe.  Expect it to happen again, and with deeper impact.  With fewer options available, retailers will need to consider every option available to stretch labour dollars to build flexibility into their systems while minimizing costs.  Self service will grow.
  • With capacity for design resources made available affordably to those who did not have it before, expect to see ever more products available in much shorter runs.  With more differentiated products available to serve the Long Tail, this could mean reduced sales for big box stores, as niche players find a place in the market.  It will probably also drive a number of niche players to work via mail order via the web and skip the retailer altogether.   At the very least, the big players will have to be more selective in their product mix for sale, and either way it makes life more complicated, with smaller segments served by individual products, or with many more SKU’s available and having to be tracked and turned in stores.
  • In the even bigger picture, for very simple products, retailers can expect to see the problems that the music industry and the movie industry have experienced for a few years.  Not only can these printers make a prototype, they can make a product.  The makerbot makes the potential of downloading plans for a model car and building it myself quite real.  With this technology in its infancy, it is not a stretch to build your own mobile phone with the right plans, some plastic, and some kits from my favourite electronics store in the near future.  Retailers and manufacturers will have to consider the potential of tomorrow’s Napster not sharing music, but plans for the latest Nike shoes, or a Google Phone Knockoff.

Social Media today, Social Manufacturing tomorrow.  From More reading:  Makers, Makezine.

2010.05 | iPad Store

January 29, 2010 Tim Dickey Leave a comment

I read a great quote recently about the Apple iPad release on Wednesday.  While Steve Jobs commented that Apple and iPad were placing themselves at the crossroads of Technology and  Liberal Arts, Stephen Fry says: “He might perhaps more accurately have said that Apple “stands at the intersection of technology, the liberal arts and commerce”.”  This is an excellent point and it will be fascinating to see whether the iPad catches on, and what impact this will have on the consumer landscape with respect to the buying and selling of media.  While many will dissect the features of the device itself, the fact of the matter is that this device and others like it are driving us ever further along the road of the new consumerism where customers don’t go to a physical store – the store is always on and always in our bag or our pocket, and the ability for instant gratification and delivery is a reality.

iTunes dwarfs all other sellers with respect to music and media online, and are now making a break towards reading material.  Amazon built internet commerce with their store and their impossibly long shelf of books.    Amazon recognized the potential of the shift to portable electronic media when they came out with the Kindle and Kindle DX.  The implications of a massively popular device that allows for downloadable media like books, newspapers and magazines are massive.  While Kindle has opened that door a crack, iPad has the potential to rip it right off the hinges with the volume of users it can bring to the party.

iTunes and other online stores have the capability to charge a reduced rate for a publication that can be provided instantly.  There is no more incentive to wait in a queue ’til midnight for the new Harry Potter novel, to wait until 5 am for your morning paper, or to wait for you monthly subscription to Wired to arrive.  It just arrives.  While the Kindle does this already, the iPad can take it up a notch by providing a more accurate reflection of the physical experience of reading a magazine and some books by providing a flashy, engaging full colour format in a novel, hip, interactive package – one upping the Kindle. 

From a consumer facing organization perspective, this opens another rich mobile channel.  With the iPad, consumers now have a web enabled (though no flash) 9.7″ 1024 x 768 screen in their hand wherever they go.  They’ve not only got the store in their pocket to buy music, movies, books, newspapers and magazines, but they have a portal to the physical world that does not currently exist. 

The package presented by the iPad transcends the problem with mobile devices – the small screen.  Now consumer facing organizations have a bigger window to show clients.  Instead of trying to order a meal from Swiss Chalet on your mobile device and having to scroll through myriad menus and sections to pick your options – all very well done considering the screen real estate at Swiss Chalet Mobile – consumers can potentially look at a menu exactly as you would see at the store, pick the items off the touchscreen, and finalize the order in a format and interface that is far more like being in the restaurant than either a PC with a mouse or a mobile device.

The GPS and compass in the solution allow that “full screen” device location enablement.  The purchaser of a new dress can look online for a matching pair of shoes online while she is in a cafe by perusing a visual search engine such as Like.com.  That shopper can now see that the pair of shoes that she likes are at Nordstrom.  If Nordstrom has thought it through, she would be able to see on their site that the store has 1 pair left of size 6, and she can have them put on hold for her at the click of a button.

The fullscreen also provides an interface more likely to drive clickthroughs on targeted advertisements as well.  This provides a potentially rich opportunity for the beleagured magazine and newspaper industries who can now provide richer feedback to advertisers on who is clicking on their ads, and allow those advertisers to use the GPS to drive offers to readers with a further level of refinement.

It appears that consumers and retailers alike are in for a richer mobile experience.

2010.04 | Self Service and Vending Collide

January 23, 2010 Tim Dickey Leave a comment

Consumers have been accustomed to vending machines in Canada for decades.  Pop, candy, and bubble gum machines are ubiquitious – seen at the front of stores across the country.  If you are old enough, you may even remember cigarette machines in Canada – banned long ago with the age verification problems associated with them. 

Self service in the form of ATMs, airline check-in kiosks and self-checkouts also have a strong presence across the country.  While the technology of vending machines seems relatively rudimentary and mechanical compared to their upscale counterparts, vending machines and self service are quietly converging.  Mark’s Work Wearhouse, for example, is experimenting with smart vending machines that sell clothing. (Yes, that’s me in the video clip) 

While it seems a bit strange to conservative Canadians to extend a  brand with vending, considering the incredible number of vending machines in places like Japan, it’s an interesting idea to try to expand one’s reach without building a whole store, or fitting into an environment where a store wouldn’t work.  Why not expand the brand beyond the traditional idea of a store? 

Examples of technologies and business models that can make this work:

PharmaTrust – Build an entire (well, most used perscriptions, anyway) pharmacy and then provide access to licenced pharmacists via video link. What a great opportunity to provide access to pharmacy services in small hospitals, clinics, places of business – wherever. 

ZoomSystems – Provide an entire store as a vending machine.  Best Buy and Rosetta Stone have used these, among others.

Vigix – This solution is a smart vending platform that sees all items for a vending machine sent in one secure container via courier, replaced by the courier with a smart RFID tag in the machine that opens it when the new cassette is near the machine.  This removes cost, effort, and shrink involved in stocking a traditional vending machine, while providing the intelligence of a processing unit that can provide interconnectivity to systems like a traditional kiosk platform.  It is now possible for higher value items to be dispensed in a much smaller platform in locations potentially useless for other uses.

2010.03 | Touchscreen or Keyboard?

January 14, 2010 Tim Dickey Leave a comment

The iPhone versus Blackberry debate brings out many strong opinions around the best interface for a mobile device.  Many business users rely heavily on a keyboard, and love Blackberry for it.  iPhone users have become accustomed to the less tactile, but very flexible input option of the touch screen.  What it truly comes down to is the use to which one puts the device.  If a great deal of text input is required, a keyboard is usually optimal.  For interactions that go beyond text input, a touchscreen has many unique benefits.

This same discussion has arisen many times with respect to self service solutions in a real life retail environment and the best interface depends on the solution.  Experience dictates that in many (not all) self service situations, a touch screen is a better option.  While the decision needs to be made based on the application and its intended audience, there are a number of valid reasons to utilize a touch screen keyboard instead of a phyical keyboard, including:

  • Cost Effectiveness - Additional acquisition and maintenance costs for physical keyboards are avoided with the use of touch.  Ruggedized keyboards necessary for self service can be costly with diaphragms built in for spillage and dirt and are composed of many moving parts.  Moving parts are the most likely to fail – particularly in a retail situation.  Given the size and scope of self service deployments, these cost savings can be significant.
  • Usability - An onscreen keyboard can simplify user interaction as it keeps the clients eyes in one place – on the screen.  As most kiosks are touch screen based, it is generally more intunitive to users to have one interface point – the touch screen.
  • Multi-Language Capability - Given increasing globalization, and regional language requirements as in Quebec, using on screen keyboards allows them to be adjusted by user.  Choosing a different language in the application provides another keyboard – a facility impossible with a standard hardware based keyboard.
  • Interface Flexibility - An onscreen keyboard provides the ability to customize a keyboard to suit the purpose of the application.  For example, if an entry requires only numbers, a number pad only can be shown on the screen, or if the application is searching a directory, non-relevant keys can be set as inactive, and relevant keys can be highlighted.
  • Interface Customization - A touchscreen keyboard can be changed to match the application and branding of the kiosk and can even by adjusted by banner.
  • Increased Uptime - Adding peripherals like keyboards to a system increases the potential for system failure. Keyboards can be broken, lose keys, are often spilled upon in consumer facing environments.
  • Responsiveness - The current iterations of touchscreen technology and fast processors mean a far more responsive product than in the past that is as responsive as a physical keyboard for minimal data entry. Take the increased usage of the iPhone with its touch interface as a confirmation of increased customer comfort with this interface.
  • Security - A touchscreen keyboard decreases security effort and risks by removing the need to lock down system based keyboard combinations like Ctrl-Esc and Ctrl-ALT-Del.
  • Customer Perception - Avoiding a physical keyboard provides a streamlined look for a kiosk solution – it looks like an interactive kiosk and not a PC. A kiosk is more novel and engaging to most consumers than a PC. They want to see what it does. Watch them in a store.
Categories: retail Tags: , ,

2010.02 | Scan those Coupons!

January 8, 2010 Tim Dickey Leave a comment

Given the Great Recession, one hears a great deal about coupons to encourage shoppers to buy.  Coupons have been around for quite some time, but are still surprisingly low tech in Canada.  While grocer specific coupons and offers are scanned, manufacturer driven coupons are generally accepted as part of a manual process in Canada.   This is an area ripe for automation to the benefit of retailer and consumer alike for the following reasons:

  • Cost Savings - Given that 84% of households in Canada used coupons in 2008 one would expect significant manual effort in gathering the coupons, validating the manufacturer, and tracking down the reimbursements.  With the constant attempt to reduce cost and employee effort, this represents real potential savings to a retailer.  If this effort is not completed, the retailer is providing customers discounts for certain brands out of their own pockets.
  • Throughput - While clerks still need to check expiry dates and validate the product purchased (why isn’t that automated via a central database?) scanning removes the need for at least 5-6 keystrokes per coupon – saving valuable minutes to the checkout process.  More people get through the checkout faster, and fewer people are embarassed by pulling out their coupons or frustrated by those who do so in front of them in the queue.
  • Customer Convenience - Self service solutions like kiosks or self-checkout are rendered less beneficial if coupons require manual entry.  Keying in coupon amounts represents an operation too complex for self service, (not to mention a fraud risk) reducing the amount of customers that will use it.  For those that attempt it without knowing coupons are manual, the transaction will be slowed by attendant intervention and will discourage the use of self service.  This all adds up to customer frustration which can reduce sales.
  • Fraud Reduction – While it is not possible to completely eliminate fraud, the increasing use of GS1 Databar codes may help, and if the codes don’t work on the scanner, it is easier for a clerk to refuse the coupon – minimizing potential losses.
  • Redemption Tracking – Knowing one’s customers becomes increasingly important in competitive times.  Understanding coupon redemption will enhance market basket analysis.  Enabling vendors to get an accurate, timely view of how consumers respond to an offer is extremely valuable, and can also allow for quicker response to coupon problems as data will be available to understand behaviour electronically.

While marketers, vendors and retailers are certainly on top of providing coupons via electronic means – email, web, mobile – there are few to date that are leveraging around electronic coupons: via 2d barcodes, NFC, or redemeed automatically at the checkout via a loyalty card.  While the individual values are small, coupons are important to a value conscious shopper, and the collective impact of coupon automation could be significant, so breaking the code is key.

Categories: retail Tags: , ,

2010.01 | eBooks > Physical Books | Mobile POS Ideas

January 1, 2010 Tim Dickey Leave a comment

eBooks > Physical Books - Amazon sold more ebooks than physical books on Christmas day.  While, as the article says, this was obviously driven by the fact that many people who received Kindles as gifts were purchasing books, and few people are likely to shop on Christmas versus many other days of the year, it is still a watershed moment.  This event strongly points to the Kindle as a potential iPod for books, and to a trend that may actually see consumers finally lean more towards electronic devices for reading media.

More importantly to book retailers, the reader itself represents a cheap, simple, direct channel right into the pocketbooks of consumers.  (Convenience, recommendations, 7×24 availability, and immediate satisfaction..what more could one ask for?)

The jury is still out, but this is an encouraging development for the Kindle and e-readers in general.  Add to the eBook discussions all of the incredible scuttlebutt of the continuously rumoured Apple Tablet, and we can expect lots of talk on electronic reading in general across the board.

Mobile POS Ideas - More potential for POS and mobile solutions came to the fore of late.  Of particular interest, more iPhone credit card readers, and movie theatres leveraging a mobile POS platform. While it’s still early days, and functionality and reliability leave a lot to be desired at present, look to this technology to become increasingly common in appropriate consumer facing places of business.

Categories: retail Tags: , , , ,

2009.52 | Having it Your Way

December 23, 2009 Tim Dickey Leave a comment

Bespoke products have been common for a number of years – custom Levis and custom Nikes are a couple of well known examples.  A recent NYT article profiled the practice of purchasing customized gifts online.  This trend highlights the increasing ability of companies to provide products and solutions that are customized to the individual.  This is true of not only the products, but the manner in which consumers can obtain them.

Consumer facing organizations would do well to note Trendwatching’s 10 Crucial Consumer Trends for 2010.  Understanding these consumer directions is key to implementing a technology roadmap to accommodate the infrastructure necessary to stay ahead of the competition and build consumer interfaces that allow each company’s own unique customer base to connect, interact and transact business in the way that they choose.

Categories: retail Tags:

2009.51 | Quick Thoughts on Trends

December 18, 2009 Tim Dickey Leave a comment

Tis the season for packed schedules.  Given the lack of time for all, here are a few very brief items around retail technology (ok, some of it goes beyond retail) for 2010:

2009 has seen lots of change, expect more in 2010!

Categories: retail Tags: , ,

2009.50 | Gift Card Ubiquity

December 11, 2009 Tim Dickey Leave a comment

Gift cards become very visible at Christmas during the time of giving.  What’s driving the deluge of cards in Canada?  As always, there have be benefits to all parties to give a phenomenon momentum.  For consumers:

  • the elimination of gift card expiry dates in Ontario by law (and other provinces moving forward) has increased interest
  • they can be purchased outside of the issuing stores via programs like Blackhawk Gift Card Mall, providing a very convenient mall in a kiosk
  • their small size makes them portable for shipment anywhere around the world – no taxes, no duties, no problems
  • the prevelance of chain and big box stores often makes them usable close to most recipients, wherever they may be
  • they can be purchased online and sent to a recipient, avoiding a store visit and providing a personalized gift
  • while they are effectively cash, they indicate a level of thought based on where the card comes from (music lover = iTunes gift card)
  • they provide a simple way to gift without knowing sizes of the recipient for clothing purchases (avoids embarassing size gaffes)
  • there is no charge for MOST of the programs

At the same time, this provides the issuing organization a number of benefits:

  • for regional players, it brings in purchases from outside their normal geographical limits
  • they obtain funds up front – drives year end results
  • many cards are not redeemed or only partially redeemed resulting in income with little cost
  • there can be upsell to holders of cards – those with $100 cards will purchase an item over $100 and pay the balance
  • outside programs like Blackhawk can extend the reach of issuers with very little investment needed
  • assists consumers with fickle recipients and driving a sale
  • organizations can track the usage of cards to understand consumer behaviour of both purchaser and recipient
  • certain organizations can drive the cards to be used as an ongoing tender, locking in customers and revenue streams
  • drives revenue to stores in ways cash gifts cannot

Increased usage means increased competition for dollars spent on gift cards.  More usage can be expected for organizations that can get creative about the processes and features of gift cards, and there are so many ways to deal with this very simple concept.   There are a number of areas of potential, and examples around these:

Marketing - Differentiating one card from another will depend on the needs of the organizations constituents.  Examples of approaches include customized gift cards, buy 2 cards, get one free, and unique sizes and shapes.

Initial Purchase - Options will need to suit the target market for the cards.  In general, the ideal is allowing consumers the potential to purchase via the three key channels: point of service, via the internet, and mobile, and many cover at least two of these, with the third on the way.  As a twist on point of service, retailers and vendors are providing kiosks that print custom cards with unique images and names of givers and recipients.  The technology is proving itself and coming down in cost, so we can expect to see more of these in the future in higher volume initiatives.

Transfer to Recipients – Being able to provide the gift in a novel, simple and creative manner that suits the giver and the recipient.  Apple has provided the capability to provide a gift card via Facebook.  Amazon provides gift cards via email.  It won’t be long until we can purchase gift cards in Twitter.

Validating Balances and Adding Value to Cards - if this is simple and convenient with no costs, it can drive more usage of the card and more business to the card issueing organization. The Starbucks iPhone app (available in US only) allows users to register their cards on their iPhone, shows the actual image of the card they have, and add value to the card at the click of a button.  Toys R Us allows consumers to scan their gift cards at store price verifiers to validate the balance on the cards.

Redemption -  Simplicity and convenience can drive more usage of gift cards.  Starbucks iPhone app is providing gift card redemption via 2d barcodes on a trial basis.   Online stores like iTunes allow gift cards to be connected to an account and used against purchases until the amount is used up.

Given the increasing market of gift cards, expect the level of ingenuity to increase over the next year as everyone scrambles to get a piece of the market.

Categories: retail Tags: , ,

2009.49 | Square is Beta

December 1, 2009 Tim Dickey Leave a comment

As discussed some time ago, Jack Dorsey’s new startup for mobile payments, now officially called Square is moving forward.  (See posts 2009.21, 2009.25 and 2009.42) The website went live this afternoon as reported by Tech Crunch.

The details appear to be very similar to original expectations.  A small dongle connected to the microphone port of any device allows for clients to swipe a credit card, for payments.  The program is in beta and the website doesn’t indicate much else.

Their are some real benefits to consumers here:

  • No fee for the service = free is always good
  • Uses can see receipts online = useful for tracking and searching
  • Vendors can track loyalty of Square users to their business = potential rewards for loyalty
  • Emailed / Texted Receipts = no paper used and less trash
  • 1 cent of each transaction donated to charity of choice = social responsibility points
  • No power drain on phone as unit is powered by swipe = less mobile charging

It also provides upside to businesses based on what’s on the site, but details are still sketchy:

  • Signature verification still used = 1 point of verification to which consumers are accustomed
  • Photo Verification – device seems to show photo of payee = 2nd point of verification
  • Ease of Entry – Small biz can run anywhere with just a mobile and take electronic payment
  • Virtual Loyalty Program – some indication of user tracking = rudimentary understanding of client base
  • Hipness factor = seriously, I’m takin’ your payment on my mobile

All these items are goodness, and full marks to this organization for looking at things differently.  It’s a great effort, and the results will be very interesting.

Now let’s ponder some of the open questions:

  • Transaction Fees – Square appear to avoid the whole cost splitting situation among banks, mobile phone companies, payment processors, and others by going around the current paradigm.  Great!  This is free to the consumer.  Someone needs to pay for this transaction.  Nothing is free.  Who is paying for this?  Is it the retailer?  Is Square selling mined data in some way? Is it advertising based?
  • Platform Fees – What are the fees to the retailer/consumer facing organization, if any?  High credit card fees being charged to businesses are a big issue in Canada these days.  If you are using a card, the retailer pays in some fashion.  Does this change that?
  • Hardware – From whence comes the dongle?  Who pays for it?  How do we get it?  How much does it cost for the consumer?  What if I lose it?
  • Usability – Looks straightforward on the site, but it still needs to pass the I’m in front of 5 other people in line and I can do the transaction in seconds. This means I have to have my phone ready, the dongle ready, my card ready, and the app ready.  Now you tell me the amount, indicate how I pick you as the vendor, I swipe my card, do my signature, you look at my photo and agree and the we wait while the payment processes.  This will not be as fast as transactions on the current system at POS terminals, and will probably not work well in high volumes based on the model portrayed.  It also fails the “so simple my mom can do it” test that I recommend for in store retail payments.  If it isn’t simple at the front end of a retail establishment, it will be difficult to obtain consumer acceptance.
  • Security – The signature on a touchscreen will be interesting.  Most of us sign with a pen, and not our fingers so the signatures could be questionable.  The photo ID is a great idea assuming it goes quickly from one unit to the other.  This scenario will also involve passing ones card to the payee, which is to be avoided for security purposes (see contactless and EMV)  EMV is a whole other question.  Not currently slated for the US, EMV is a necessity in other countries like Canada.  This would require a re-think of the dongle to a larger unit – in fact  it would be almost as big as an iPhone no matter how you look at it, as the card stays in with the chip in contact with the terminal.  That would be a game breaker.

No matter what happens next, this is a laudable attempt at mobile payments, and one has to cheer an organization just going for it.  The beta program will be closely watched!